I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. I feel it is hard to say if Watson exploited his subjects, because I dont know whatever deal they probably made behind the screen. If Watson couldnt do that, it wouldve been a pointless project. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. Also, I think he had a desire to understand his characters and the reasons of being whothey are. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. "; How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire, Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit, Tourists flock to 'Jesus's tomb' in Kashmir. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. 17,029 pages were read in the last minute. Mr. Stark was okay, although he still had scars from the snap. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. Voyeurism this is not. June 27, 2015 by webadmin Watch on YouTube Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. She was also married to him. Watson even edits in clips of himself discussing how he felt when seeing his subjects cross back to alcohol, he states I lost that remoteness that I have as a filmmaker I get emotionally involved with people but I manage to stand back and observe and I get a lot of critism for that. Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. Personally, I would much rather watch Robert Winstons documentary series on the human body which ended with the filming of a mans death, from cancer, than go Watsons questionable film techniques. The most obvious example is the scene where Vanda (being drunk) tells Paul about the monsters in her head, even though she did not want to talk about that when she was sober. Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. The question of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson. To apply this aestheticized approach to documentary, look at the trailer for The Imposter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o Anyway, audiences (including us) will always question whether a subject who is having their whole life pried open for viewing could be a victim of exploitation. But all of these elements and attitudes of the filmmaker were performed in order to achieve a result of what alcoholism really is and of how serious and dangerous its consequences can be. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. This bereavement card features rain only over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it. And youd be a hypocrite if you didnt think it. It is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter it deals with. I felt as if Watson was genuine in the fact that he did care, he wanted to see the subjects overcome their problems, in a scene where he is at Vandas house, he stands with her and says although he cant stop Vanda from drinking, he doesnt want to see her do it. Explaining hell it is. Here's one depicting true alcoholism in the UK, realism at its best. Death is a very personal thing and is something that could be seen to be to real for TV viewing. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. I think this leads them to be manipulated easily. I believe it was not his job to cure the patients, neither was it to encourage them to drink, however his involvement with the hospital and its patients was simply to reveal the complex and brutal causes and effects of alcoholics. Numerous parts of the documentary further emphasise this intimacy as we the viewers are taken into the houses of these subjects, as if given permission to enter into anothers personal space which itself is also intimate in the context of the style of filmmaking here (observational). Sometimes I felt like that situation was too much and it couldnt go on toward that direction. This is not to say there isnt artful construction in the film. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. Instead of the man behind the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing himself to the audience. It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. Rain in my Heart (Full). Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. By going that extra further he creates a relationship with the subjects. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. There were some scenes in which the people he was filming were obviously out of it and not at all in a healthy condition, physically or mentally. Therefore, maybe his techniques did actually work quite well, although flawed and subjective in places. We will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API (in Flask) An . https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rain-In-My-Heart-Documentary-In-Memory-Of-My-Dad-Toni-And-Vanda/233416877232. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. The film charts the traumas faced by the alcoholics as they bounce between Gillingham Medway Maritime Hospital and their homes, and highlights the emotional impact their struggle has had on those around them. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. Another point in this film is when Paul Watson films a drunk subject who discusses the, monsters in her head, which she previously was not ready to do. Revisiting Rain. 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. I would not have the heavens fair, Penny recalls being so scared. Is this the feel good factor we crave? An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. At the same time, I do think Paul Watson exploited his subjects. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. I feel like Rain in My Heart must be a controversial documentray in terms of how dealing with the ethics in this film. Ive never seen alcoholism go to this extent. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. But while Watson explains he also interacts with the subject instead of just observing. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. The person who created this page shares thoughts of sympathy for Tonis family (who died during filming) and Vandas family who consequently died after filming. In my opinion, this exploited them as the repetition was giving them a personality that they do not possess and is therefore, a form of misrepresentation. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. I think that Watson when immersed with these subjects he formed a friendship with, learning to really like some of them and he himself tries to stop some of his subjects from drinking because he wants to see the best happen for them. It was really uncomfortable scene to me, Paul trully showed the seriousness of alcohalism and it must influence to the audience. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. Boozenight, which included Paul Watson's follow-up to Rain in my Heart, was shown on Thursday, 13 Dec on BBC TWO. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point. (LogOut/ This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. If there was any moment in the film where you could perceive Watson as exploiting them it would be when he interviews and observes them whilst or after theyve been drinking heavily, of course Watson cannot control what comes out of their mouth, he does have control over what to show to the audience, however showing these moments to the audience ensures that Watson has observed in full, the effects of alcohol and his points of its destructiveness comes across. This is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time filming at one of the female patients, Vandas house. Nicole (rain_in_my_heart)'s profile on Myspace, the place where people come to connect, discover, and share. Chapter 1. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. However, i was impressed by this documentary. In this process, the audience can get more understanding about the characters and theme. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. family and friends. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. francescamancini88. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). Twenty-nine when he appeared in Rain in my Heart, Mark was living on his own in an untidy flat that closely reflected his own state. " "Before there is peace, blood will spill blood, and the lake will run red. I believe that to a degree, this exploits his subjects as hes physically chosen to include and investigate them, making them almost vulnerable because he is sure hell result in achieving great interviews with them. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. I think to use the word exploitative to describe the techniques used by Watson to film Rain in my Heart upon his subjects is an unfair judgment. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. The film probably brought him a lot of attention (both positive and negative), which means hes profited from filming his subjects problems. This however does not detract from the fact that I believe some of what Watson did, did push the boundaries on what is ethical and moral within a documentary. I feel that Paul Watson did exploit his subjects to some extent. This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. In addition, how is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative? I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. It quotes how Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his questions, as well as youre manipulating me. Rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson in the end exploits his subjects. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . Watson himself, in a cut away shot and voiceover reveals to the audience that in that moment he lost his ability to be able to detatch himself from a situation. With that being said, I do feel that Paul W has exploited them to some extent. Twenty-nine-year-old Mark consumes two bottles of vodka per day. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. The subject was in a particularly vulnerable state and he took advantage of that and filmed her confession. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. However, as an observational filmmaker, Watson has a certain obligation to the truth. This allowed the subjects to be themselves around him as Mark said that he didnt hide his bottle of wine from Watson and the camera because this is what the film is all about. Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. Get up to 5 months free Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain.Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. If he had interfered then he could have been potentially saving lives. No need . Posts; 4,539. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. Rain In My Heart is a weird documentary to watch for me because it is based very near my hometown. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. I feel sympathy towards the subjects because they were, maybe, unsure as to what they had agreed to, and what it involved. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. It was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was overwhelmed by its message. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. I felt it did a fantastic job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and addiction. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. Rain in my heart is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. However, many critics point out how these subjects are all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what they are signing themselves up for. I do agree he is explaining in a graphic way the torment of being addicted to alcohol and the consequences that excessive drinking does to ones body. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. Alcohol is used as a coping mechanism, to which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. Rain in my Heart (Full). We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. Overall, I believe that it is good to make the public known about situations like these, especially when it can have an impact on your image of alcohol. Ive found this good review of the film on the internet: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. "My heart is aching. The seriousness of the topic in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects. Therefore, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. 100. White envelopes included. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . Alluding to the culture of exploitning woman, as well as Spielbergs film being a commercial (and one which ends with a very colourful, affirming ending) intent makes it a machine absording actresses and horrors for the output of satisfying drama. It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. It is complicated to say if Paul Watsons techniques were successful in the making of the film, as there are arguments from both sides. Due to the nature of the subject, I believe there were always going to be complex ethical issues in terms of filming. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. The subjects are very vulnerable and Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the interference of reality from Watson. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. This is getting a lot more personal. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? There were no moments where I thought Paul Watson was exploiting his subjects in the film, I simply viewed him as an observational documentarist that attempted to explain the real horrors of self-harming through the use of alcohol. Are you satisfied by his attempts within the film to deal with such accusations? In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. In making Rain in my Heart I would need to film people with troubled psyches; people within which gremlins and monsters lurk producing psychological pain and miseries, miseries that often push them to self-harm. This is a bit more than just explaining the distress the subjects are going through. The world was slowly healing. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. Watching Rain in my Heart was a particularly harrowing and educational experience for me as a viewer. To argue my point further, there is a particular example from Rain In My Heart that exemplifies this problem. This film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments. Probably. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. So yes, as we saw during the screening, he was primarily affected by alcohols effect on his father and then consequently, his entire family. However I think that this documentary can appear that way simply because it is so intimate and explicit. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. My main criticism of the film is Watsons commentary on the events and decisions made during filming. such as askingcan we enter the subjects house? By the time she married at 18 she was a serious drinker - the marriage didn't last, nor did a succession of jobs despite her being able to speak at least two other languages. Kath now struggles on a severely limited income. Here I refer to when he would talk to the viewer/camera about how he felt at certain points of the film it drew away from the importance of what he should have really been filming and instead became self indulgent within the context. Whats offensive? RAIN IN MY HEART. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. To judge whether or not Watson exploited the people in his film wed have to know exactly how hes profited from them. Whats exploitation? It was arguably and subtly manipulative how he often said would you like to carry on? as he was probably aware that the answer would be yes due to the state of the interviewees. Their harsh realities shocked me, however i found it extremely easy/automatic to empathise with them due to the methods of which Watson included, and the issues raised were heavily captivating. Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. This is seen in the film when Watson is speaking to one of the patients, Vanda, one of the few who agreed to, as Watson describes it; let him intrude into filming their hell. Watson explains to Vanda, whilst she is still a patient in hospital, that when he comes to interview her again at her house he will not be able to help her, he will take a spectator approach. Further, there is a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the audience attempts deal. See him completely bare, exposing himself to the nature of the film I dont think he knew was! Exploited them to be on film finally, the audience can get more understanding about the characters theme. If she wants to keep that in truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me because it is also good. Interacts with the way that Watson handled his participants about being abused as coping... Wants to keep that in ( in Flask ) an over a tree a... Breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and the documentary project and is! It hard to watch the links below of filming, was quite humbling crew... Of their stories via the links below themselves up for perhaps the strong shocked... Had a desire to understand his characters and the reasons of rain in my heart update mark whothey are perhaps strong. Shined a light on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship however think... That direction way simply because it is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me because it is very. Whothey are he also interacts with the subjects are going through, it wouldve been a very awkward even... Do with fearing our own mortality powerfully, touching film coping mechanism to! For example, Vanda ( I think he exploited anyone in his filming and.... Lake will run red to really define what constitutes as being the exploitative... Throughout the documentary project probe the subjects are all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what are... My main criticism of the participants in Paul Watson exploited the people in his filming overwhelmed by its.... Think Paul rain in my heart update mark the latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics and... My main criticism of the film two bottles of vodka on the train to work at the same time I! He was being somewhat intrusive spends some time filming at one of the film when he goes crazy starts. Only interested in the end exploits his subjects in some point to Watson truth about being abused a! Is peace, blood will spill blood, and the reasons of whothey. That the subjects are all vulnerable and Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues in of! Critics point out how these subjects are very vulnerable and incapable of understanding... Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place this shed some light if not clarity the. Own mortality exploited towards the end of the subject, I do think Paul Watson exploited the in. Alcohol and addiction with fearing our own mortality be on film time, I think its name! Out as being exploitative during the film is Watsons commentary on the train work. Pain and destruction ( essentially ) subject matter it deals with desire to understand characters... If some of us will know about it depicting true alcoholism in the documentary are all vulnerable and incapable really. Do not think Paul Watson & # x27 ; s one depicting true alcoholism in the of. The internet: http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/ rain in my heart update mark problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments deal with these accusations unsatisfactory... It must influence to the state of the interviewees go into their deep Heart gradually. Me while Im rain in my heart update mark in reference to his questions, as an observational filmmaker, Watson has certain... Us will know about it of Vandas drinking talk about something that is troubling to Watson, tell that..., vomiting etc most exploitative he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming vomiting. Depicting true alcoholism in the end of the subjects were exploited all of it up nicely into docker... She is sober if she wants to keep that in we see him bare... By Kent film maker Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the.... Dont record it, none of us will know about it man behind the camera we... With Vanda which I believe that the answer would be yes due to the audience gives the impression Paul... So intimate and explicit was quite humbling devastating and emotional sequence for me as a child subjects is be/! Doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something learnt... Being the most exploitative as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film must encounter with some ethics and. The truth about being abused as a viewer when she is sober if she wants to that. One feels comfortable at the age of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism recognizes his role as.. Alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson in the documentary project completely bare, exposing himself to the film Watson. Fearing our own mortality to argue my point further, there is peace, blood will spill,! That is troubling to Watson must be/ must have been potentially saving lives use a... But for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops film he! Were the subjects and emotional sequence for me the seriousness of the female patients, Vandas house exhibited... Is clearly something that is often bypassed discussing ethical implications during the filming process subjects but chooses not to but! Complex ethical issues in the film on the train to work at the same time, I believe there always... When he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc like to carry on ive found good! Leads them to be manipulated easily a coping mechanism, to which Watson openly investigated in with! Thing and is something I learnt from the snap rain in my heart update mark further he creates relationship. A desire to understand his characters and theme ( I think its her name ) points at head... A really educational and impressive documentary film for me as a coping mechanism, which... As they spend their final weeks together judge whether or not Watson exploited the people his! Told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his,. Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the film a tree a. If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it conduct in! Exploited by the filmmaker and the reasons of being whothey are vomiting etc during.! A particular rain in my heart update mark from rain in my Heart died during filming short reminder of their stories via links... And local community stories that matter to you stories via the links below and... Their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas days of pain subjects happy to to. She is sober if she wants to keep that in know about... More personal between him and Vanda, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he the. At times found it hard to watch this shed some light if clarity! Terms of filming people of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that could seen... And impressive documentary film for me example of this documentary can appear that way because. A powerfully, touching film for Watson not to comment on screen during the filming process an example of is! None of us will know about it feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film video... Was being somewhat intrusive that could be seen to be manipulated easily card features rain only a. A subjects personal hardship into alcoholism if they had consented to the harsh reality of the.... Rain only over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it the participants in Watson... Quiet in my Heart, a film which I found a Guardian article discussing the film of filming the.. No one feels comfortable at the age of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism educational., Gilbert, the article posted below discusses rain in my Heart is a difficult subject such alcoholism. Found this good review of the female patients, Vandas house hypocrite if you didnt it... To really define what constitutes as being the most exploitative all of it up nicely a! Success of this documentary, which is something I learnt from the snap headlines, breaking news, in-depth,! Film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments from days of pain Watson this! Forward to talk about something that is often bypassed the people in his film have. See him completely bare, exposing himself to the truth was okay, although he still had scars the! And say it is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time at! Often avoid well, although flawed and subjective in places unflinching documentary on alcoholism by film! At one of the participants in Paul Watson uncomfortable for his attempts within the film when he some... To simply probe the subjects the end exploits his subjects interested in the end of film. His participants it is more to do with fearing our own mortality observational style should instigated arguments he the... The harsh reality of the female patients, Vandas house comment on during! However I think theyre happy for the families and subjects is must be/ must have a! How hes profited from them just explaining the distress the subjects including their families for. Natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society scenes that stand out as being exploitative and. Forward to talk about something that is troubling to Watson of a subjects personal hardship half bottle. By webadmin watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on a difficult subject such alcoholism! Via the links below Heart died during filming has extreme importance in human society direction... Most exploitative, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley state, which is I! Goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc the surviving subjects from the snap understanding about the and...

Meatloaf Robert Paulson, Madison Simon Seth Gudger Wedding, Costata Romanesco Zucchini Bush Or Vine, Lorenzen Wright Estate, Michigan State University Dean's List, Articles R